Share via email (Opens in new window) Email 640 (internet and other satellites) China’s Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation 156 “This could easily grow to 50,000 or more,” Seitzer said. Instead of six to nine Starlink satellites in view at a time, astronomers might need to dodge a couple hundred bright satellites during twilight hours. But Seitzer’s simulations assume that the satellites will be at SpaceX’s current operational altitude of 550 kilometers. London-based OneWeb, which launched 34 satellites in early February, adding to the six it launched in 2019, is putting its constellation in a 1,200-kilometer orbit, which SpaceX is also considering for later launches. At that height, the satellites might appear fainter from Earth. But that also means more of the orbit can be seen from the ground, leading to larger numbers of satellites visible and for longer into the night. At the Cerro Tololo observatory, higher-orbit satellites would be visible all night long in the month of December, Seitzer said, when many would not disappear in Earth’s shadow. “I don’t like that equation,” he said. “I’d rather have the damage confined to a small time rather than have it go all night.” The actual damage to any one scientist’s research depends on what’s being studied. For Cliff Johnson, the Starlinks in his November 18 image doubled the amount of unusable picture elements, or pixels, from about 10 to 20 percent. “It’s annoying, but it’s not necessarily hurting the science all that much,” he says, referring to his work. Despite their name, the dwarf galaxies he’s searching for appear relatively large through a telescope and so a few satellite streaks won’t obliterate one image. And Johnson’s survey always takes multiple images of any one patch of sky, so there’s a chance to fill in lost pixels. “That’s not the case across the whole astronomical community,” Johnson says. For astronomer Krzysztof Stanek of Ohio State University in Columbus, hordes of bright satellites in his telescope views could be a disaster. Stanek helps run the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae, a network of 24 telescopes that scan the skies for exploding stars. On January 15, recently launched Starlink satellites flew in low orbit over one of the telescopes Stanek’s team was using, leaving streaks that remained in an image even after data processing that usually smooths over such blemishes. “We have an image with about 10 trails comparable in brightness to what a distant supernova would be,” Stanek says. While that’s not yet typical, “I am extremely concerned that, once [SpaceX reaches] the projected size of the network, there will be multiple satellite trails crossing any given field of view at all times.” Rubin’s dilemma Already, scientists working on the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope — recently rechristened the Vera C. Rubin Observatory (SN Online: 1/10/20) — are anticipating trouble. Starting in 2022, the Rubin Observatory, also in Chile, will take images every three days of the entire sky for 10 years. But reflected light from satellites could mess with twilight observations required for searching for Earth-threatening asteroids that might approach from the direction of the sun, says Tony Tyson, an astrophysicist at the University of California, Davis and chief scientist for the observatory. The arXiv.org study suggests that 30 to 50 percent of exposures taken around the beginning and end of the night will be “ruined.” SpaceX’s Starlink satellites (one illustrated, left) are flat with a single solar panel that unfolds like an accordion. OneWeb’s satellites (one illustrated, right) are boxy and flanked by two solar panels. From left: SpaceX; OneWeb The new satellites also could jeopardize a study of how dark matter has evolved over cosmic history. That study depends on sensitive observations of faint galaxies that some satellite trails can mimic. Recent experiments have shown that Starlinks are just too bright for Rubin’s detectors, Tyson says. Pixels are like little buckets of light that can overflow, leading to image streaks that completely mask light from the cosmos and to “ghost streaks” caused by electrical interference with neighboring pixels, all of which hinders data cleanup. The observatory’s researchers are working on a three-pronged fix. They are developing new algorithms to recover some lost data in defaced images. The team is also looking into slowing the rate at which information is read from the image detectors, which can reduce electrical interference between pixels at the cost of slowing observations just a bit. Finally, the group is testing whether it’s possible to sidestep the satellites altogether. The survey will use artificial intelligence to shift the telescope’s gaze from one patch of sky to another, while keeping bright objects like the moon and satellites away from the telescope’s view. However, a fully populated Starlink system could give the AI a headache. “It works like a charm for maybe 1,000 [Starlink] satellites,” Tyson says. “Once you get above 10,000 satellites, it starts failing, and by the time you get to 50,000 satellites, it ends up in a wild goose chase.” The team is working with SpaceX to include Starlink orbit details within the AI itself, though it’s unclear how much that will improve things. Cosmic Wild West SpaceX has said it will fix the brightness problem, and some astronomers are cautiously optimistic about the company’s willingness to engage. One of the 60 satellites launched January 6 was coated with a substance to make the satellite darker than its siblings, and astronomers will be watching to see if that helps. But if the dark coating works and makes the satellite sufficiently faint to optical astronomers, scientists who use infrared telescopes might not be thrilled — a dark satellite absorbs more heat, making it brighter to those telescopes. Researchers who are less impressed by SpaceX’s response wonder why the company darkened only one satellite in its fleet. “If they were serious about it, they would have stopped launching more satellites,” at least temporarily, Stanek says. “They would conduct a good scientific study of their impact, and then maybe they would start launching again.” Cooper, the SpaceX representative, confirmed at the January Honolulu meeting that the company will continue launching unmodified satellites — a fourth batch went up January 29 followed by a fifth on February 17. The next launch, from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center at Cape Canaveral, Fla., is scheduled for March 14. As recently as March 9, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk declared that Starlink will have no impact on astronomical observations. “Zero. That’s my prediction,” he said at the 2020 Satellite Conference in Washington, D.C. “We’ll take corrective action if it’s above zero.” OneWeb did not respond to requests for comment, while an Amazon representative said the company is not granting interviews at this time. Private companies face little international oversight on their activity in space, so there is no guarantee that SpaceX will continue to work on the problem or that other companies will collaborate with researchers on ways to minimize the potential damage. And that’s the rub: When it comes to rules on private companies, space is the Wild West. Negotiations to establish regulations would require cooperation among many countries, possibly mediated by the United Nations, and that could take many years to work out. The International Astronomical Union said in a Feb. 12 statement that it will regularly brief meetings of the U.N. Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space to bring “the attention of the world government representatives to the threats posed by any new space initiative on astronomy and science in general.” But the satellite launches are happening now, so astronomers can only hope that private companies are receptive to their concerns. Scientists also realize they have to balance their desire for clear skies with the potential benefits of expanded internet for those without access. At the January meeting, Pamela Gay, an astronomer with the Planetary Science Institute who is based in Edwardsville, Ill., asked speakers at one of the conference panels: “How do we argue to save the skies but not allow low-cost internet to be an option to remote places?” Panel members agreed that a swarm of low-orbit satellites is the most cost-effective way to establish fast, reliable internet across the globe. But the astronomers also hope companies will think of the night sky as a natural resource to be protected, like a national park, and minimize the disturbance from internet satellites. “We can have these two things together,” said Ruskin Hartley, executive director of the International Dark-Sky Association in Tucson. “We need to come up with a way that we can help bring the social groups of the world to technology and innovation that protects the heritage of dark skies around the world.” Questions or comments on this article? E-mail us at feedback@sciencenews.org | Reprints FAQ A version of this article appears in the March 28, 2020 issue of Science News. Citations